Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 28,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am
Florida v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 11:42 pm
In the case of Leek v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:42 am
The 9th finds that AEDPA's deference to state holdings unless it is contrary to a Supreme Court decision does not require an exact lining up of facts, but is rather to be compared to the general holding of the precedent. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:12 am
Read the whole case, Walker v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:51 am
” In 1984, in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:34 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Part Two detailed the line of Supreme Court precedent going back more than a century rejecting ISL premises, at least in federal election contexts (as distinguished from other places the Constitution refers to state “legislatures”), including Davis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
State and federal authorities are often hundreds of miles away, without the local resources to investigate crimes. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
On September 13, 2018, in Electric Power Supply Association v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
On September 13, 2018, in Electric Power Supply Association v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
John RobertsonWhole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
She further stated that her attorney had answered her questions and that she was satisfied with the services he provided. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:36 pm
Gulilat v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:36 pm
Gulilat v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Santa Fe Industries v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:09 pm
Supreme Court to decide punitive damages issue in light of its new punitive damages ruling in State Farm v Campbell, which gave confusing guidance on the degree to which the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is violated by a large award;After considering State Farm v. [read post]
