Search for: "Long v State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 45,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Yesterday the SCOTUS handed down the long-awaited decision in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
Civish, 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (failure to state a claim and Eleventh Amendment immunity); Olsen v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
United States as conferring constitutional status on the warnings and the associated exclusionary rule. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Although decided over two decades apart, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
Long, 173 N.J. 138, 161 (2002) (quoting State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 6:10 am
A 1998, Fourteenth District Court of Appeals case styled, John A Daugherty, Jr. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:57 am
Tiensia v Vision Enterprises Ltd (t/a Universal Estates) [2010] EWCA Civ 1224 (11 November 2010) This is the long awaited Court of Appeal decision on tenancy deposit protection. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:57 am
Tiensia v Vision Enterprises Ltd (t/a Universal Estates) [2010] EWCA Civ 1224 (11 November 2010) This is the long awaited Court of Appeal decision on tenancy deposit protection. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:28 am
The case of the day is Sbarro, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
For example, Representative Long Tran (D) expressed concern to local newspaper the Georgia Recorder that the bill may discourage unions. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:28 am
Phipps wrote that in Auld v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 am
This has long been the law in Michigan, as noted in the fire damage case of Casey v Auto-Owners Insurance Company.1 The Casey court stated: We conclude that amendment was futile because the Caseys merely sought to add a variety of theories that had no factual or legal basis, and that had essentially already been dismissed by the trial court. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:03 pm
NINTH CIRCUIT FINDS “THREATENED” DESIGNATION FOR BEARDED SEALS PROPER BASED ON NEW LONG-TERM PROJECTIONS Alaska Oil and Gas Ass’n et al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Case date: 17 October 2022 Case number: No. 21-2350 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
Instead, for as long as the UK continued to be internationally responsible for a geographical territory, it would only be able to shirk its duties through actions on the international law plane. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
In Wong v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:32 pm
v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:58 am
In the recent case of Bolding v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:40 am
This dismissal led to the Department of Homeland Security announcing that the Cook County v. [read post]
