Search for: "Long v. Superior Court"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 3,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
Hopefully you enjoyed the long weekend. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
Hopefully you enjoyed the long weekend. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Are you longing for the days of predatory lending? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:18 am
Last month, the Supreme Judicial Court ordered a new trial in Dos Santos v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm
" That language, with which Justice Kennedy tellingly opens his opinion for the Supreme Court in Romer v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:11 am
No. 811, February 24, 2011, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, H.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
” Pennsylvania: Statutory Default Provisions Codifying “Pick Your Partner” Principle Defeat Claims by Assignee of 50% LLC Membership Interest If the court’s decision in DiDonato can be likened to an easy basketball layup, the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Larikov, LLC v Cao (read here) equates to a slam dunk. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Manriquez petitioned the superior court for a writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Alaska Superior Court, for example, reversed the contempt conviction of a lawyer who refused to accept a trial court’s order to serve as appointed counsel. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Black v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
I think it does make sense to have one individual serve for a long period of time in that capacity. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:58 pm
This culminated with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Estrada v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:58 pm
This culminated with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Estrada v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:13 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Razzano v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
Accordingly, the legal community’s exaggerated response to the JAC changes was “the latest episode in the long-standing partisan demonization of the Harper Conservatives as anti-Charter and anti-court. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Superior Court, 231 P.2d 26, 28 (Cal. 1951) ("if there had been a physician patient relationship, the privilege would be waived. . . by [plaintiff's] bringing the action for personal injuries").The Weiss court determined that, since neither the state legislature nor the state courts had seen fit to create a physician/patient privilege, it was not the job of a federal court, sitting in diversity, to change state law. 2007 WL 2137782, at *2… [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 11:49 am
Re Sault Dock is older by 10 years, evidently placing its birth in some long ago eon. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:58 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
