Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 13,716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2020, 4:37 am
Jackson, 92 Ohio St.3d 436 (2001) (A trial court’s error in allowing alternate jurors to remain during jury deliberation, which violated former Crim.R. 24(F), did not warrant automatic reversal.) [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
But as a matter of aspiration, it does seem legitimate to stop people from having unwanted sex with a consenting party. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:33 am
Military cyber operations do not count as “covert action” I’ve written about this a great deal on Lawfare (see, e.g., here), and won’t repeat that here. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
The full court sits only in cases of great public importance while “acting judges” drawn from the regional courts of appeal for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland may be called upon to participate in specific matters affecting their regions. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion Key takeaways of the published opinion include: CEQA is interpreted to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language, and “[t]he EIR is the heart of CEQA” with its purpose of giving the public and government the detailed information about environmental consequences, potential mitigation, and alternatives needed to make informed decisions. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:49 pm
Redmond, 724 F. 3d 729, 744. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 2:05 pm
Conservatives may be discriminated against, but so are Black Lives Matter activists. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:26 pm
Whether a student should testify has to be evaluated matter to matter, depending on the unique facts and evidence in the case. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:22 pm
As my colleagues are aware, my own preference in this specific, post-Collins case would have been to hold our matter several months in abeyance. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
“Why isn’t an in-camera inspection a safeguard enough? [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
I offer my quick and dirty CTRL-F test for whether the codes are serious or flaky, and both fail. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:00 pm
To compound matters a bit, the salty, sugary, cinnamony flavors clashed. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
For years, the government didn't think so. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
Fly, 348 N.C. 556 (1998) and the plain language of the current statute, the court held: [T]he requirement that the exposure be “in the presence of” the victim does not require a jury to find that the victim could have seen the exposed private parts had he or she looked. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
He didn't issue a detailed written order, but this passage from Gunn summarizes the matter well: The documents at issue in Defendants' motion were not filed under [seal]…. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 3:00 pm
As a general matter, I prefer aisle seats. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 10:42 am
Inc., 138 F. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 12:28 pm
She examined the matter and reported back to me later that too much time had passed to make any determinations. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am
” Brian T. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:47 am
Author: Steven Cernak When I first started practicing antitrust law in the “80’s, the Robinson-Patman Act was already an object of derision. [read post]
