Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 7,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2016, 1:43 pm
Obama’s disputed claim that he needs no new legal authority from Congress to order the military to wage that deepening mission” against the Islamic State. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:00 am
While this is certainly good news for employers, I question whether it is good enough. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Constitution prohibits Congress from withdrawing “from judicial cognizance any matter which, from its nature, is the subject of a suit at the common law, or in equity, or admiralty. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Charlesworth: 512 is approaching the 20-year-mark, and not merely of interest to © nerds or particular industries. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:30 am
That can’t be far off the mark, at least as to those who deal with video tracking. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
I know I’m a bit of a contrarian. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
I have talked frequently about THOMAS on In Custodia Legis since the first week of this blog in August 2010 when I shared the Top Weekly Bills in THOMAS. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:40 am
On Thursday, I will discuss why Congress has never used its power here, and how we might be able to get Congress to act now, before it is too late. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:17 am
If you want to catch your breath before reading further, I’ll certainly understand. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:11 am
Thank you to Mark D’Agostino, Connected’s President, for arranging the event and inviting me. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
I would say that the Klingon language may be protected by copyright. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:25 am
§ 1803(i)(2)(A) or (i)(2)(B), as enacted by the USA FREEDOM Act regarding a novel issue of law for three related reasons. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:12 pm
I argued much the same thing here a while ago, and I’m only a former law professor. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
Granting work permits to asylees or even asylum applicants thus requires no special discretion under the INA; in marked contrast to DAPA, it merely entails following what Congress expressly authorized. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:43 am
Teehankee of De La Salle University and Mark R. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
As far as I have seen, nothing in the record suggests that a change in claim interpretation standard would alter the PTO’s determination. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
In the third, I’ll discuss how Congress might legislate to more closely align the features of the AUMF with the idiosyncratic features of the conflict it authorizes. *** (Part I) How Wars End in U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
Mark Whitaker ofMorrison & Foerster says the statstell a different story...Mark Whitaker (Partner, Morrison & Foerster - appearing in his personal capacity) stated that Congress intended that the ITC would provide IPR owners with broad protections against a wide range of unfair acts of importation. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
He misreads the TPP and the Trade-marks Act. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Chanel S. de R.L., 2016 FCA 111 -> S3nd Us teH MoNey: Ransomware Advisory Issued for Canadian Companies | CyberLexCyberLex -> Controversy Over Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Certified to New York Appeals Court -> Article 29 Working Party demands improvements to Privacy Shield -> Feds back RCMP secrecy on possible use of ‘stingrays’ for surveillance https://t.co/IczGVGXHOa -> A Brief Refresher on Spam Laws, Email Marketing and Compliance https://t.co/exlFd0qlPd -> IPO tells… [read post]
