Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 19,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
See Wong v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
The officer observed that the complainant was crying, sobbing and in an excited state. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
"] March 14, 2023 - 10:30 AM [In-person]: Audemas Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Aslan stated at an oral heading in April 2024 that he was now of the opinion that he had infringed Off-White’s trade mark rights through the importation of the counterfeit goods in 2022.The Court of Appeal of The Hague thus annulled the District Court’s judgment and declared that Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:20 am
The United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:58 am
” Watt, 50 M.J. at 105 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am
Judge Polster reviewed the long history of qui tam actions in the United States, and noted that the Supreme Court, in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
This morning the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) gave its ruling in Case T‑250/13 Naazneen Investments Ltd v OHIM, Energy Brands, Inc. intervening. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:33 am
The Board of Regents, The University of Texas System v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:56 pm
Seeking further guidance, we turn to the Federal Circuit, wherein the issue was addressed in Swatch AG v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:52 am
Schlafly v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:39 am
CFA Institute v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:56 am
That latter section does not expressly state that the opposition period cannot be extended after the fact. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 3:27 am
Intellogy Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:12 am
Marathon Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
