Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:58 pm
United States? [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
For JDPI or similarly situated trademark holders to obtain a different outcome, they must seek relief before the United States Supreme Court or the United States Congress. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
552/09 P, Ferrero SpA v OHIM, Tirol Milch reg.Gen.mbH, Innsbruck (Class 46) (IPKat) Mark your calendar right! [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm
Today, Mark Dambroff tackles the subject of that flight attendant’s terrible joke on the subject. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
The transcript of oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
The case is now pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
United States, 47 S.Ct. 366 (1927). [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:37 am
Here’s a question, do you think the Wawa brand satisfies the now decade old requirement in the federal dilution law that Wawa is “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States“? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Since Daimler AG v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
The American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and another group, the Arc of the United States, urged the Court to take the case of Briseno v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:53 pm
S. ___, ___ (2022) (slip op., at 5) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:39 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
” It has been used consistently and exclusively for the secular purpose of honoring those who died fighting for the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:57 pm
“I greet most cordially members of the Supreme Court, including the chief justice of the United States. [read post]
