Search for: "Matter of Thomas"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 11,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
But Thomas refused to hand it over, and the FBI seemed to drop the matter. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:39 pm
You should also keep in mind that a judge may make a ruling in your case without you being present, such as civil matters like a divorce hearing. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
By my count, there have been only three originalists in the modern (post-1937) period-- Black, Scalia and Thomas. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:24 am
We recently learned of Thomas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:28 pm
Counsel responded that although her client would be better off if the matter was calculated again using current data, a remand was not essential. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 8:56 pm
Justice Thomas pointed out that the same argument could be made against application of the mailbox rule in every case. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm
Of course the merits of the travel ban case have yet to be decided, and intervening events may or may not change matters; of course a denial of certiorari isn’t a merits disposition; and so on. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:20 am
" Because Hill and Thomas are both Black, one might have thought that her highly credible allegations of grossly inappropriate sexual comments could not plausibly be compared to the kinds of extrajudicial responses to unjust and racist accusations that characterized America's long history of lynchings, but so deep is the vein of racial pain that Thomas and his Bush I administration handlers had little difficulty turning that pain to their advantage. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
A Black lawyer or an attorney with a Black client would be justifiably worried about receiving a fair hearing from Judge Pryor, who has a mixed history when it comes to matters of race. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:25 am
Justice Thomas returned to his dissenting opinion in Term Limits v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:00 pm
Today’s conflict between majority and dissent is a perfect illustration of this, with Justice Thomas insisting that the Court should be applying a presumption of regularity and the Court not doing do. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Thomas' preference for local rule was clear. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:09 pm
For that matter, Justice Thomas’s concurring opinion, with which Justice Gorsuch joined, reiterated the “view that the Religion Clauses require civil courts to defer to religious organizations’ good-faith claims that a certain employee’s position is ‘ministerial. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:55 am
S. ___, ___ (2015) (THOMAS, J., concurring); Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:45 pm
Doesn't matter if I'm right. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:16 am
J., and THOMAS, BREYER, KAGAN, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:31 pm
Thomas P. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
” But Justice Thomas sees the judge’s role differently – as deciding whether it will be effective to impose the threat of jail to motivate a deadbeat dad pay, as the father in Turner had done in response to three previous contempt proceedings. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
Thomas), Scott Johnson (of the Powerline blog), and myself. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
As Justice Thomas noted in dissent, it requires no great leap to conclude that any person whose credit file contained such inaccuracies should be permitted to sue. [read post]
