Search for: "Page v. Page" Results 3141 - 3160 of 32,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2007, 11:32 am
Those things are pretty routine.But it does so today.Let me summarize -- in my own words -- Judge Reinhardt's three-page order. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 6:51 pm
Judge Trott concurs to basically slam the California Court of Appeals for not getting on the same page. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:29 am
  Not because it involves anything doctrinally complicated, and certainly not because the legal issues were exciting enough to be worth wading through sixty-seven pages of text. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:44 am
Judge Gould writes a 22-page, single spaced opinion that can probably be summarized in a single -- telling -- paragraph. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:44 pm
At the bottom of page 326 in this opinion today, Judge Betty Fletcher uses "sur-reply" when describing the response of the United States to the reply brief of the defendant. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:32 am
Turn directly instead to pages 5578-80 of the slip opinion, which is where the majority responds to the dissent. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
  That's pages 2 through 8.One the other hand, you have the mitigation evidence. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:35 am by Robert Brammer
H.R.1 [115th] An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018. 3. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:48 pm
So perhaps we should not be surprised that Thomson Reuters decided to kill off the Federal Appendix in 2021 without much fanfare.The final bound volume of the Federal Appendix was volume 861, and the ultimate case by page number was Vittetoe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 12:01 pm
"As for sanctions, "the record in this case, designated by [Appellant], was voluminous – over 15,000 pages of clerk’s transcript, plus another 1,400 pages of reporter’s transcript, which comprised over 60 volumes total. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:31 am
 (go to page 29 of the 36 page opinion to read the three certified questions).In their opinion ruling against the driver and for the City of Aventura they "distinguish City of Hollywood v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:29 am
"Sadly, [Appellant] v. 23 Bottles of Beer, here, is not an in rem case (23 Bottles of Beer being an LLC). [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:39 am
Below is a line from page 7 in an unpublished decision here: (Mastick v. [read post]