Search for: "People v. More" Results 3141 - 3160 of 43,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2015, 10:35 am
 Made even more difficult by the reality that (1) some ailments truly do not have many objective signs, and (2) some people are willing to claim ailments of this type but do not in fact have them. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Steve Hall
"He was always so concerned about people being treated fairly and with dignity," Hines said. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
That Schad becomes even more of a model prisoner; mellower (with age), more regretful, more coherent, more human. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
Moreover, the phrase “Terms of Use” appears in blue font so that there is even more contrast…. he highlights that the actual number of people who clicked on “Terms of Use” is very small – less than 1 percent. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:56 pm
In People v Buchanan [4th Dept 6/6/08] (here) the Fourth Department unanimously held that the use of a stun belt that is not visible to the jury is subject to the same judicial scrutiny as other forms of physical restraint that are visible. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:35 pm
  There are definitely worse officers out there.But am I pleased that the officers seem to be far more interested in playing Pokemon Go while on the job rather than actual police work? [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Morris, 2018 ONSC 5186 “Mr. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
Of the more than 201 people with information available, 104 were hospitalized, including 28 people who developed hemolytic uremic syndrome, a type of kidney failure. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
As Brooklyn changes, so do its juries: “more sophisticated people… they don’t believe [plaintiffs] should be awarded millions of dollars for nothing. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am by Eric Goldman
In that circumstance, CSAM likely will become more prevalent, and that will add more fuel to the regulators’ fire. [read post]