Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 3141 - 3160 of 178,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2014, 10:44 am by Stephen Bilkis
The instant action was brought before this court after the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the statute of limitation grounds was denied and after discovery proceedings were held in response to the defendant’s demands for greater specificity in the plaintiffs bill of particulars. [read post]
3 May 2014, 10:44 am by Stephen Bilkis
The instant action was brought before this court after the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the statute of limitation grounds was denied and after discovery proceedings were held in response to the defendant’s demands for greater specificity in the plaintiffs bill of particulars. [read post]
12 May 2014, 10:44 am by Stephen Bilkis
The instant action was brought before this court after the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the statute of limitation grounds was denied and after discovery proceedings were held in response to the defendant’s demands for greater specificity in the plaintiffs bill of particulars. [read post]
3 May 2014, 10:44 am by Stephen Bilkis
The instant action was brought before this court after the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the statute of limitation grounds was denied and after discovery proceedings were held in response to the defendant’s demands for greater specificity in the plaintiffs bill of particulars. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
"Chicago gun lawsuit plaintiffs apply for permits; Lead plaintiff critical of $100 fee": Today's edition of The Chicago Tribune contains an article that begins, "Two years after filing a lawsuit that ultimately forced the city to dismantle its 28-year-old handgun ban, Otis McDonald walked into a police station Monday and applied for a permit allowing him to keep a gun at home. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 1:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Accordingly, a reduction of the lodestar by more than 80% was upheld by the Court here based on the plaintiffs relative lack of success, excessive attorney hours and rates, the case’s lack of complexity, and other factors. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Dirty Jokes on Sex Harassment Plaintiffs Computer Ruled Fair Game [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
Plaintiffs Groups Mount Effort to Undo Supreme Court’s ‘Iqbal’ Ruling [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:18 pm by ADeStefano
The Court found that the assumption by plaintiff's economist that plaintiff could no longer work in any capacity was supported by the testimony of the plaintiffs' physicians that the side effects of his pain medication limited his employment possibilities. [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:18 pm by ADeStefano
The Court found that the assumption by plaintiff's economist that plaintiff could no longer work in any capacity was supported by the testimony of the plaintiffs' physicians that the side effects of his pain medication limited his employment possibilities. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:11 am by Docket Navigator
The court awarded plaintiff discovery sanctions and rejected defendant's objection that plaintiff reviewed defendant's document production too slowly. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Richard Montes
Contrary to the defendants' contention, in determining whether the plaintiff's initial burden has been established, the Supreme Court is obliged to consider all of the evidence, including the proof adduced by the defendants which cures any defects in the plaintiff's case. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:17 pm by Orin Kerr
Because McIntyre’s deletion of a single photograph from plaintiffs digital camera constituted only a de minimis violation of plaintiffs Fourth Amendment rights, McIntyre cannot be held liable under the Fourth Amendment for his actions. [read post]