Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 4,649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
That ruling avers that despite the requirement of the state to prove every element of an offense beyond a reasonable doubt, if a challenge to an element of the offense was not "firmly rooted" in state law, the state can bar such a defense without offending due process of law. [read post]
26 May 2013, 3:05 pm
Mortimer v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 3:05 pm
Mortimer v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:33 am
United States. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
Again, in the past we have distinguished between collection in the United States and abroad,[20] but location seems to be harder and harder to determine in real time. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
The nongovernmental organisations which are signatories to the Joint Memorandum of Understanding on Fire and Building Safety (dated March 15, 2012), having stated their intention to support the implementation of this programme, shall, at their own election, be signed witnesses to this Agreement. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:57 am
Brady v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) stated that “the actions of the department have in fact impaired the First Amendment. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:01 am
This is reminiscent of the way the state of Alabama treated the NAACP back in the 1950s! [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:01 pm
At best, if the [applicant] is correct, and there is an increase in speed which only occurs on computers, it is a matter of abstract computer science.[2.13] During oral proceedings before the board, Re Gale’s Application was briefly discussed, and the Board finds it useful to comment on it.[2.13.1] Mr Gale had found an algorithm for calculating square roots, which he had implemented as a computer program. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
For example, Gale’s Application claimed an improved method for calculating square roots, to be implemented in ROM. [read post]
13 May 2013, 3:00 am
See also, Henningsen v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:49 am
Ch. 2012) (slip op.) that fiduciary duties are rooted in equity. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:45 am
This bring us to the second case, Tremblay v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 10:00 am
United States. [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:39 pm
The DC Circuit’s opinion in National Association of Manufacturers et. al. v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am
Commercial speech v. speaker—corporate entity v. person. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:17 am
NYT v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:22 pm
Whether the decision in the case C-645/11, Land Berlin v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
