Search for: "Scales v. State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 2:50 am
There has also been previous FCA enforcement in this area, see for instance FCA v Barnett Michael Alexander (2011) and FCA v Corrada Abbattista (2022). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:10 pm
The large scale of the no-match situation can be measured by the SSA’s Earning Suspense File (ESF), an electronic fund constituted of earnings that cannot be matched to the accounts of workers. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 2:44 pm
In McMahon v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:55 am
The ECJ’s rulings in the Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de España SAU (case 275/06) and LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH v Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH (case C-557/07) confirmed the necessity to balance data protection and IPR under the light of the principle of proportionality, but it did not provide any clear guidance as regards the role of intermediaries in the identification of… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:30 am
In Marvell Int’l v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:57 am
In Marsha McDonald v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm
The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The OTF has stayed away from such activity, because experts have cautioned that these “large-scale circumvention tools” present security concerns themselves, as they are closed-source technologies—meaning that researchers can’t vet them to understand their unique vulnerabilities. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:30 am
What resulted was quite possibly the largest fine imposed upon a lawyer for spoliation of evidence, In Lester v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:48 am
Particularly of note was the 2024 Veirein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:29 pm
With this introduction I pulled up the opinion of Maples v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:02 pm
In Circuit City v. [read post]
17 Aug 2004, 12:05 pm
"[1] In Blakely v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm
The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
Judge Moon is fundamentally stating that if Congress merely feels there is a rational basis for doing so, Congress may force all people to purchase a particular product to increase the economies of scale and thereby reduce the purchasing price for everyone. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:29 pm
They would be scaling the walls of the Palace of Versailles. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
In the 1972 Cantebury v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 2:53 pm
The Act expressly restricts speech — and it does so on a massive and unprecedented scale. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
Google v. [read post]
