Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 10,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm
On December 12, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve this issue. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
After the court refused the motion, the plaintiff moved to certify a proposed class of "[a]ll persons residing in the United States who hold a United States copyright interest in one or more books reproduced by Google. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:26 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
In previous gay rights decisions, such as United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:30 pm
United States was a quiet one, with several of the justices saying so little that it is difficult to discern what they are thinking. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:50 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am
The claimants argued that, reliant on M v Newham [2020] EWHC 32, the duty was immediate, unqualified and non-deferrable. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:55 am
In the United States, Internet Service Providers that follow the rules are provided a powerful shield by two federal laws. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
It would have a hard time saying otherwise, since the government itself petitioned for Supreme Court review on this very issue a couple years back in the much-relisted United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 1:04 pm
The two year rule is not an absolute rule in any event and if an employee works just short of two years even Illinois state courts will not likely enforce it strictly. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
The Facts The Supreme Court summarized the basic facts with admirable concision: This dispute had its start in a decades-old, short-lived music venture. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Public Works, 257 A.D.2d 972, the Appellate Division upheld the employer imposing a greater penalty that the one recommended by the hearing officer as there was ample evidence in the record to support the employer’s decision.In short, courts are reluctant to substitute their judgment for that of the employer on the fairness of penalties, but will do so if the penalty appears grossly unfair -- the standard established in Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222.The Pell… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:29 am
United States, 134 S. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
§ 437g(a)(8)(A), which states that "Any party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party ... may file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:51 pm
In Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:57 am
They fled gender-based violence and threats to their lives in their home countries and sought asylum in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
State v. [read post]
