Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 3141 - 3160 of 14,868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
But, course, elite lawyers disagree.The post Mission to Israel Part V: There Is No "Apartheid" appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
R (Joseph) v LB Newham [2008] EWHC 1637 (Admin) Blanket policies are unlawful. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:45 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The Court just handed down its decision in Holder v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
  This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:44 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Because the Medicaid program is, by design, a partnership between the Federal and State governments, “Congress did not pass a [F]ederal body of trust law, estate law, or property law when enacting Medicaid. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
Hopefully a full suit of body armor won't get in the way of your swing.The footnotes in this one are unintentionally hilarious. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
In addition to injuries caused by the rape, she suffered a broken nose, black eyes, and bruises all over her body as a result of the attack. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
  He says one of the documents, by the Prime Minister, shows the Prime Minister’s failure to understand that Parliament, as the sovereign body, may wish to ask questions of the Executive. 1435: Lord Pannick QC begins his submissions. 1429: The second Note discusses the effect of Part 4 of the interlocutor issued by the Inner House. [read post]