Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 3141 - 3160
of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2015, 5:58 am
(b) Confidentiality of patient safety work productNotwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, and subject to subsection (c) of this section, patient safety work product shall be confidential and shall not be disclosed.42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm
(c) The United States must train current and future generations of American workers with the skills to develop and apply AI technologies to prepare them for today’s economy and jobs of the future. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:44 pm
L. c. 203E, § 802 (a). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:27 am
Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kennedy joined, dissented (Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 3:49 pm
State v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
In Thompson v Leben Home for Adults, the court stated that in the absence of such a good cause showing, the court has no discretion to entertain even a meritorious, non-prejudicial cross motion for summary judgment. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Material designated CONFIDENTIAL shall not be disclosed to any person or entity located outside the United States and shall not be sent, distributed, or otherwise taken to any location outside the United States except that such material designated CONFIDENTIAL may be disclosed to principals and employees of a party outside the United States who a) would have access to such material under the provisions of this Protective Order if located in the United States;… [read post]
Symposium: “Schrödinger’s tax” is dead – and the command to buy health insurance is unconstitutional
9 Nov 2020, 6:28 am
In Seven-Sky v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
`Under Rule 12(b)(3)(B), a defendant may contest the sufficiency of an indictment on the basis that it fails to state an offense . . . [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
[c.] [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In this regard, the threshold for distinctiveness is not dependent on the public’s level of attention (Smart Technologies v OHIM, C‑311/11 P).Lack of distinctive character of the mark applied forAs regards the issue of distinctive character, the applicant maintained that the relevant public would perceive the mark as the letter ‘v’ for ‘vericiguat’ rather than a representation of a heart. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
(Id.)B. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
Sergeant C. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
Here's the text of the proposal: WHEREAS in 1957's Sweezy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
Viacom states that this method of business only grew after YouTube was bought by Google for $1.65 billion in late 2006.The Section 512(1)(c)(A) issues: Surely YouTube knew what was going on! [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:23 am
The Secretary of State’s objections were twofold: the inability to test the validity of the witness’s evidence, and that the information may reveal something that would indicate a threat to national security abroad, but bound by SIAC’s order she would be unable to alert the foreign state, affecting diplomatic relations. [read post]
