Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 3141 - 3160 of 8,247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  At this point, he put his cellphone in his dash mounted cell phone holder and used it to record to the car that cut him off. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:41 pm
§355(j)(2)(A)(v), which required generic drugs to have labeling “the same as the labeling approved for the listed drug. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:12 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 261 (patent holder “may … grant and convey an exclusive right under his application for patent, or patents, to the whole or any specified part of the United States”). [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Antonia Gold, Olswang LLP
ICTA, s 103 states that where a trade (whose profits are chargeable to tax) has been permanently discontinued, profits arising from the carrying on of the trade before its discontinuance were, if received after the discontinuance, chargeable to corporation tax under Case VI of Sch D. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
 The UK considers that the patent holder should just pay the national renewal fees (and would be protected). [read post]