Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
Elenis, (Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming).Mark V. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:33 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:33 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
For publication opinions today (6): Mark Liddy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
BY MARK JOSEPH STERN The Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Allen v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
See Wong v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
The officer observed that the complainant was crying, sobbing and in an excited state. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
"] March 14, 2023 - 10:30 AM [In-person]: Audemas Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Aslan stated at an oral heading in April 2024 that he was now of the opinion that he had infringed Off-White’s trade mark rights through the importation of the counterfeit goods in 2022.The Court of Appeal of The Hague thus annulled the District Court’s judgment and declared that Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:20 am
The United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:58 am
” Watt, 50 M.J. at 105 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am
Judge Polster reviewed the long history of qui tam actions in the United States, and noted that the Supreme Court, in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
This morning the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) gave its ruling in Case T‑250/13 Naazneen Investments Ltd v OHIM, Energy Brands, Inc. intervening. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:33 am
The Board of Regents, The University of Texas System v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:56 pm
Seeking further guidance, we turn to the Federal Circuit, wherein the issue was addressed in Swatch AG v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]