Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 13,235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2019, 6:59 am
Comparative legal theory has heretofore emphasized that the United States is more consumerist than it is producerist—privileging low consumer prices over producers’ welfare. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:47 pm
Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari in Hagan v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:51 pm
Similarly, a person charged with a state jail felony prostitution case (who does does not a previous conviction for that state jail offense) must be placed on probation. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
Decided a few weeks after Price v City of Ocala, Price v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:20 am
EklecCo NewCo LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 5:30 am
In the absence of an agreement fixing the price for the services, appellee was required to prove that the price charged for his services was usual, customary and reasonable; this he failed to do. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:57 pm
See Bartels v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 5:34 am
In Telesis Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am
Illinois, which stated that indirect purchasers were unable to bring suits forward. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm
Section 17501 states, “No price shall be advertised as a former price of any advertised thing, unless the alleged former price was the prevailing market price as above defined within three months next immediately preceding the publication of the advertisement or unless the date when the alleged former price did prevail is clearly, exactly and conspicuously stated in the advertisement. [read post]
21 May 2019, 9:41 pm
– DC by Brook Gotberg As a guest blogger on this site invited to talk a bit about Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:08 am
The complaint states that the claims are purely strict liability and negligence claims, and that the plaintiff expressly eschews any allegation sounding in fraud. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:14 am
In State v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
She mostly challenged two assumptions, namely that (1) data would be shared with the government at low, competitive prices; and (2) incentives to collect data are given, and that firms would continue to collect data, notwithstanding governmental access to such data. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 ... is still viable after Gross v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 ... is still viable after Gross v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 2:31 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:04 am
”); United States v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 3:10 pm
In Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
