Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 15,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2014, 5:09 pm
In the recent case of Jeffery v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 10:09 am
Chan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
Grace v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Fraticelli v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am
The Court noted, among other things, that the failure of a company to sue (or its decision to settle) may be the result of impecuniosity caused by the defendant’s wrongdoing, so the company’s decision does not constitute an intervening act in the chain of causation. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 7:27 am
Relying on the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Even more recently, on September 19, 2016, the Medical Information Working Group (MIWG) filed an amicus brief on these issues with the District of Massachusetts in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
It is well-settled that under Massachusetts law, a 911 call can be used as the basis for a stop on suspicion of drunk driving. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:12 pm
United States, No. 06-0106 (2d Cir. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:57 am
Munro v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Cathey v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 3:00 pm
For this, the state Supreme Court disbarred St. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court decision is Fox v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am
Significantly, the letter of termination sent to Taylor failed to state that intoxication was the reason for his dismissal. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:43 am
While exposure of official police misconduct is "generally of great consequence to the public," the Second Circuit has also stated that "no authority supports the argument that reporting an alleged crime always implicates a matter of public concern," such in Nagle v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am
Significantly, the letter of termination sent to Taylor failed to state that intoxication was the reason for his dismissal. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 12:56 pm
A short answer to the plaintiffs’ theory (which she did not give) is that treating a liberal state standing rule as a “property right” for federal constitutional purposes would convert every state law with such a standing rule into a federal constitutional right, subverting the settled understanding that such law is for each state to determine. [read post]
