Search for: "State v. So"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 117,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
One is this: if what prosecutors say is true -- and let us remember we have only heard one side of the story so far -- what went on with the Jones v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
However, whatever the source of the authority, “if an official has authority to speak for the State, he may have the authority to do so on social media. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:18 am
However, as I explained here, in State v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
“How would each of you have decided Loving v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
Unlike most CFAA cases, RyanAir DAC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 8:01 am
Limited v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
Shortly after Riegel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Most state prisoners arenot so lucky, as the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act prohibits thefiling of a “second or successive” petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
Not so for the United States—which fielded especially skeptical waiver questions from two judges on the panel. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
In the recent case of Graf v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
By a rare 9-0 vote, in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 8:40 pm
The first guy speaking, mentions the Alaska .v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:58 am
Several indispensible plaintiffs were California residents at the time of filing, so there is not complete diversity of the parties. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 10:08 am
Today, the Maryland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Ehrlich v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 10:26 am
In doing so, the Court rejected Taylor’s argument that Lathrop and Keller are no longer binding, because of intervening precedent from Janus v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 2:13 pm
” If you recall, in my case Eells v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:53 am
On 23 February 2021, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in Zabolotnyi v Mateszalka District Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:03 am
State, 298 So.2d 491, 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
The judge finds that Everyone In cannot properly be described as prescriptive policy guidance, but can safely be described as “an initiative”, so the Secretary of State was not bound by the constraints on changing policy. [read post]