Search for: "State v. So " Results 3141 - 3160 of 117,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
“How would each of you have decided Loving v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
Not so for the United States—which fielded especially skeptical waiver questions from two judges on the panel. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by David Markus
Most state prisoners arenot so lucky, as the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act prohibits thefiling of a “second or successive” petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 10:08 am
Today, the Maryland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Ehrlich v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 10:26 am by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
In doing so, the Court rejected Taylor’s argument that Lathrop and Keller are no longer binding, because of intervening precedent from Janus v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Several indispensible plaintiffs were California residents at the time of filing, so there is not complete diversity of the parties. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:53 am by Robbie Stern
On 23 February 2021, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in  Zabolotnyi v Mateszalka District Court. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am by SW
  The judge finds that Everyone In cannot properly be described as prescriptive policy guidance, but can safely be described as “an initiative”, so the Secretary of State was not bound by the constraints on changing policy. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am by Jane Chong
This week, a federal court in Oregon rebuffed him; the following post summarizes the most recent developments in United States v. [read post]