Search for: "State v. So "
Results 3141 - 3160
of 117,849
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2024, 4:03 am
The court relied heavily on In re Hubbard, In Hubbard, the Eleventh Circuit relied heavily on United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Dept. of Commerce – and who have engineered the SEC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
As to the latter, the panel ruled that failing to make a material disclosure required by Item 303 can serve as a predicate for a Section 10(b) claim, so long as the claim’s other elements are well pled. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:50 pm
, and so controllers tend to forego compensation entirely, which, of course, seems reasonable because they already have so much equity in the company that they are plenty incentivized to come to work every day. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:23 pm
So if $600 gets garnished from your monthly Social Security check to pay your IRS debt, that $600 still counts as part of your monthly income to determine what welfare programs for which you might or might not be eligible.Now, Legal Aid has a point; that's somewhat silly, because you're still poor, since you don't actually get the $600, so it seems a bit crazy to say that you're not poor because "in theory" you get an extra $600 a month (that you… [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm
But, as explained in Counterman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
InPadavan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:44 am
[18] FAR 31.201-6(e)(2); see also Raytheon Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
Assuming they do so, the Republican Party would almost surely nominate him for President at its July convention. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
So too could the Attorney General go against Matter of Wang and adopt a broader interpretation of INA §203(h)(3). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
Finally, some may worry whether, even as it promises a “revolution in the enforcement of international human rights law,” the Court’s interpretation of “erga omnes partes” obligations so as to expand standing may place undue expectations on states &ndas [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:06 pm
” Doe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
