Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 3141 - 3160 of 19,740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2016, 4:03 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the orders for this blog, while Mark Walsh covered the grant in Star Athletica v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
The strict liability rule in s2(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 holds that publications which create “a substantial risk that the course of justice in the proceedings in question will be seriously impeded or prejudiced” will be in contempt. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Although Rajavi is the de facto leader of the People’s Mojahedin Organisation of Iran, that organisation is now de-proscribed in the UK (but still banned in Iran). [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am by INFORRM
In Galloway v William Frederick Frazer, Google Inc t/a YouTube and others, Mr Justice Horner in the High Court of Northern Ireland refused an application by Google Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 12:36 pm
What Justice Humes says is absolutely right:"Skulason’s point is well taken. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:38 am
Hewett v First Plus Financial Group Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 312.Well, this is an interesting one. [read post]
This month, a civil rights milestone — the 44th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in the ACLU case, Loving v. [read post]
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Eric Goldman
This legal risk is one of the many downsides of government-compelled explanations, an issue pending before the Supreme Court in the NetChoice v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:12 am by Ronald Mann
The Court next week will hear oral arguments in what may be the highest-stakes (at least in terms of dollars potentially at stake) case of the Term, Universal Health Services v United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Ruchelsman denied the motion, finding that none of the evidence offered was conclusive and that “there are still questions of fact whether the plaintiff is an owner of the corporation. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
After five years, Regeneron has finally captured its transgenic mouseThe AmeriKat has had very little time to digest this morning's Court of Appeal decision in Regeneron v Kymab & Novo Nordisk [2018] EWCA Civ 671 which reversed Mr Justice Carr's finding that Regeneron's patents were insufficient. [read post]