Search for: "Summers v. Summers" Results 3141 - 3160 of 9,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2010, 1:12 pm
On October 12, 2010, the Supreme Court agreed to review Global-Tech Appliances Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
A school employee giving reasonable assurance of continued employment is ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits between school yearsMatter of Sultana v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2010 NY Slip Op 09598, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIt is “black letter law” that "A professional employee of an educational institution is precluded from receiving unemployment insurance benefits during the time between two successive academic years where the claimant has… [read post]
Friday, half of holidays, and an additional five consecutive days over the summer, the trial court erred in declaring Mother to have sole physical custody in light of the significant parenting time awarded to Father. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Neither confusion concerning the administrative procedure nor an agency employee's incorrect information toll the running of the Statute of Limitations for filing an appeal Smith v Commissioner of Labor, 2012 NY Slip Op 05887, Appellate Division, Third Department An applicant for unemployment insurance benefits received two notices of rejecting his claim for benefits. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 3:28 am by jonathanturley
The scholarship also allows the recipient to work as a summer associate at Jones Day, one of the most sought-after firms for summer employment. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm by Kevin Sheerin
In May 2003, petitioner filed a complaint with the EEOC against Zagara who learned of the complaint later that summer. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 10:09 am
This morning the Supreme Court announced it will hear an appeal of a lower court ruling in FCC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, David Bridge and Jessica Foley, both solicitor-advocates within the CMS litigation & arbitration team, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this summer in the matter of Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31, which concerned whether the rule against reflective loss bars creditors of a company from claiming directly against a third party for asset-stripping the company. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
They criticised the corporates in books, radio interviews and, in the case of two of the attorneys, presenting a lecture at the Summer School at University of Cape Town. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm
Little noticed, among the various orders it issued at the outset, was a request in Case No. 11-438 (see p. 7 of the order list) that the Department of Justice -- that is, the Solicitor General -- respond to a petition for rehearing filed over the summer in a case which the Court had declined to review on June 29, 2012 -- the day after it issued its controversial decision in National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. [read post]