Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 3141 - 3160 of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
After Texas orders a brewer to stop consumer sales, the brewer responds that it doesn't own the brewing facilities, it leases them. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:03 am by editor
Second, don’t hold the domain hostage in order to lever up your position in a business dispute. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) EU Parliament passes 'Telecom Package' - only judges can order net disconnections (Ars Technica) Extraction and databases - the ECJ rules in Directmedia Publishing GmbH v Albert-Ludwigs- Universität Freiburg (IPKat) Google refuses to submit to Europe's data protection regime (IMPACT) Germany Court tells P2P company RapidShare that it must proactively monitor content for infringement (Ars … [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
From Justice Thomas's statement respecting denial of certiorari today in Doe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 1 and 2 March 2017 Popplewell J heard an application in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers which raised data protection issues. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm by Bona Law PC
The Order aims to reduce the trend of corporate consolidation, drive down prices for consumers, increase wages for workers and facilitate innovation. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
A study that examined the activity of patent assertion entities in the German patent market also confirmed these data: T. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Spectrum News has covered the issue of internet sales tax and the implications for consumers. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm by MOTP
It will be interesting to see whether the case will end up in the Texas Supreme Court, which last year passed on an opportunity to weigh in on this issue. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:28 am by Russ Bensing
  In his brief, Salah argued that the motion to withdraw a plea should be likened to “an individual suffering from buyer’s remorse attempting to void a commercial transaction during the ‘cooling off’ period as permissible under Ohio’s consumer protection laws. [read post]