Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 3141 - 3160 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm by Jonathan Bailey
To back up its argument, Nintendo heavily cited Midway Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
Protection only extends to that which an author has created anew, and does not extend to anything already in existence, which would presumably be available to all to use. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:39 am by Eric
 The FTC can't really tell search engines how to manage search results; they lack the expertise to do so, plus such editorial discretion has constitutional protection. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 So if the objective is to keep things in the public domain, it’s not dual protection v. nothing, but dual protection v. single protection, and he thinks that copyright might be preferable to design patent. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Administrator
As Professor Stone observed many years ago in his academic inquiry into whether trees should have standing: [t]he fact is, that each time there is a movement to confer rights onto some new ‘entity,’ the proposal is bound to sound odd or frightening or laughable. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Thus, even if the treatment regime stays consistent, your medical costs will go up. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 10:07 am by Tracy Coenen
Recently Bruce Craig, a retired lawyer from the Wisconsin Department of Justice in the area of consumer protection, published an interesting article on multilevel marketing: An Investor’s Guide To Identifying Pyramid Schemes. [read post]