Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 11,984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 11:38 pm
Randomly, the Supreme Court of the United States has taken up the meaning of "shall be made," in a recent decision:What remains is the phrase “shall be made. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
United States (FTCA; Tribal Police)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
You may also hear references to the Incompatibility Clause which provides, “no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:33 am
Tripp v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Mar. 26 in the battle over access to a drug used in medication abortions, which account for over half of all abortions performed in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Ryan Reft, Library of Congress, has posted Gideon v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 11:28 am
Yes, Alito is accusing the Solicitor General of the United States, and by extension Justice Ginsburg and the six-justice majority, of making a "meretricious" argument. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 5:29 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 9:47 am
The case is styled, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
Friedman writes about the state of affairs in eminent domain at the macro level, noting the reactions in state legislatures and the US House of Representatives' current consideration of the "Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2011. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
We agree with the position of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says the Inner House has looked at purpose and the propriety of that purpose. 14:44: Lady Hale rasies a point asking whether the example was perhaps showing that the House of Commons was raising objection against the House of Lords which was at that stage hereditory. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:40 am
In his statement to the court in State of Arizona v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:29 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Mayer Brown and its partner. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision in Horsford v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 9:49 pm
May a United States municipality tax a foreign sovereign's real property in the United States when that property is used to house its staff and other personnel? [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:47 am
On March 18, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut decided Fabian v. [read post]
