Search for: "United States v. Michigan" Results 3141 - 3160 of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by WIMS
THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS House Republicans Reject EPA Science Findings On Climate Change United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:54 am by Susan Brenner
In amending § 2B 1. 1, the United States Sentencing Commission stated it intends the . . . enhancement `to apply in cases in which mass-marketing has been used to target a large number of persons, regardless of the number of persons who have sustained an actual loss or injury. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Trump restricted travel to the United States from foreign nationals who have recently been in Europe. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm by admin
In 1968, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
In both cases, the Sixth found that no prejudice occurred.The Sixth started last Monday, April 7th, with its opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Voter Fraud Unit in Arizona Will [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit that allowed the rule to remain in effect while the EPA revised the way it considered costs in crafting the regulation—a process required by the Supreme Court’s ruling last year in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am by Mark Walsh
Justice Scalia’s point is to chide the majority for concluding that one state might be responsible for eliminating all twenty-one units of pollution if that state can do it most economically. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The NITA Conference was informative and well attended by people and tribes from all over the United States and Indian Country. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan recently addressed this issue in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:15 pm
Ct. 1727 (April 30, 2007), the United States Supreme Court has completely changed the patent landscape. [read post]