Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 3161 - 3180 of 10,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2013, 10:19 am by WSLL
OLIVER, d/b/a CRAZY TONY’S RESTAURANT v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
February 19, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Drew Estate Holding Company LLC, Serial No. 77840485 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of "Cigars made with Cuban seed tobacco"]  [Note that in In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate 97 USPQ2d 1640 (TTAB 2011) [precedential], the Board found the mark KUBA KUBA to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of… [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:49 am
 D) Who did Thomas Jefferson lose to? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
26 May 2022, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Spokane Arcades, Inc. (1985): "the [a] average person, [b] applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, [c] taken as a whole, [d] appeals to the prurient interest" (which means a "shameful or morbid" interest in sex as opposed to a "normal, healthy" interest); "the work depicts or describes, [a] in a patently offensive way [under [b] contemporary community standards], [c] sexual conduct… [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:46 am by JR Chaves
Así y todo, si siguiésemos la línea lúdica del razonamiento, un excelente abogado – mejor que bueno-   aconsejaría a Protágoras una de estas vías: A) O demandar a Evatlo por una supuesta deuda de una dracma más (un céntimo de euro al cambio) y tras perderlo, plantear un segundo pleito para cobrar las clases porque ya se habría cumplido la condición de que Evatlo ganase «algún… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:51 am by Bystander
The court must take responsibility for this (not simply leave it to the parties) in order to comply with the Overriding Objective of the Rules [Crim PR 1.1(2)(d), (e)].l The court’s directions must include a timetable for the progress of the case (which can include a timetable for the trial itself) [Crim PR 3.8(2)(c)].l The time estimate for the trial should be made by considering, individually, how long each ‘live’ witness will take having regard to the relevant… [read post]