Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 3161 - 3180 of 9,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm by Bob Farb
The United States Supreme Court granted the State’s petition to review the federal appellate court’s ruling, and it reversed that ruling. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:30 am by azatty
Today, we talk about parallel citations and what the Arizona Supreme Court says. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Savanna Nolan
You can also view Professor Colin Starger’s Supreme Court Maps on 5th and 14th Amendment doctrine, including this citation network of 69 cases between Loving v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 2:15 am by Derek Handova
In the golden age of attorneys before the 1977 Bates v State Bar of Arizona Supreme Court decision made lawyer advertising legal, practice marketing comprised word of mouth, actual social networking and other first person methods. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 12:22 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
  §13-2310 (Fraudulent Schemes) Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office  | Jail Information for Families Other Articles of Interest from our Award Winning Blog: DUI Blood Test with Medical Treatment Admissible unless Care Expressly Refused Arizona Supreme Court Rules on Voluntariness of Consent in DUI Testing Case The post Arizona Theft Case, Mistrial, and Double Jeopardy appeared first on Arizona DUI & Criminal Defense Attorney Blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am by Kent Scheidegger
  This is a point the Supreme Court has made before in Jones v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:47 am by Amy Howe
For the second week in a row, the Supreme Court did not add any new cases to its merits docket for next term. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by Laura Valade
The Arizona Supreme Court vacated the opinion of the Court of Appeals and affirmed the conviction and penalty imposed by the trial court. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Trump called the federal circuit court panel that affirmed that order “disgraceful. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:56 pm by aj
The Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government must take tribal interests into account. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:30 pm by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court says that this is a “prophylactic” on the underlying Fifth Amendment right. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 10:26 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The Supreme Court began with a statement of legal principles governing inherent sanctioning power. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Bird) suggested that Internet companies may have a legal duty to enforce such orders, but the California Supreme Court is reviewing that decision. [read post]