Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 9,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2008, 12:51 am
The Court of Appeals relied upon Credentials Plus LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:42 pm
On Monday the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Bobby v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:33 am
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:59 pm
Co., 559 U.S. 393 (2009), and Smith v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Syl. pt. 7, State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:14 am
The decision notes that it is well settled that estoppel is generally not available against the State when it acts in a governmental capacity. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:27 am
As a consequence, the English courts applied French law to determine whether Pakistan was bound by the arbitration agreement. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:10 am
The Court is bound to make all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in support of the jury's verdict. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:09 am
The Court of Appeals also found that, as to the factual basis and reliability of the testimony, the district court acted well within the wide bounds of its discretion. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:59 am
We held in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
Major v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am
Surely there are other ideas that are efficient, effective, and within the bounds of Constitutional restrictions.It’s time for state legislatures to do something more than to ask the federal government to rescue them from their use tax dilemma. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
In particular, it distinguished Williams v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 3:00 pm
In Massie v. [read post]
