Search for: "C/T"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 50,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, G 5/83 ([…] and A 54(5) EPC 2000, which according to the EBA in G 2/08 [5.9 ff.] is considered to fill the lacuna in the EPC 1973 which had been filled in a praetorian way by the EBA with G 5/83 and the case law based on that decision) has consistently been interpreted by the boards as not providing for the patentability of uses in any of the methods recited in A 52(4) EPC 1973 (or A 53(c) EPC 2000) involving means that are a “device” (see for example… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Real problem is at the C&D stage. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:55 am
It now looks like 924(c) stacked charges will be reformed soon. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:51 am
¿Cómo es posible tal cosa? [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 7:15 am
¿Es correcto el dilema de la Cámara? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
LEXIS 3 (Appeals Board noteworthy panel decision), and includes a statement represented to be a direct quote from the Rodriguez decision, as follows: “[t[he purpose of the check box is to alert the reviewer that a separate timeframe for the decision applies, and there is nothing in Rule 9792.9.1 . [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
What's "Class C" mean? [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
T 471/05, point 4.1 ; T 1265/09, point 1.4 ; T 154/04, JO OEB 2008, 046, point 27).Dans le cas d'espèce, la formulation de la revendication 1 de la requête principale ne laisse planer aucun doute sur le fait que les étapes b), c) et d) du procédé revendiqué sont effectuées par le système informatique auquel il est fait référence dans la revendication. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Lafrance c. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
But this doesn’t help, b/c then we need to know what’s necessary. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:53 am
Because iTunes wasn't performing the functions contemplated by 512(c), the C&D letter isn't the functional equivalent of a 512(c)(3) takedown notice and thus isn't governed by 512(f). [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:37 pm
Merger review is usually effective but doesn’t work here, partly b/c of history of nonintervention by DoJ. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:20 pm
B/c of independent creation as a requirement/doctrine, which sets it off from TM and patent. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Jeanne Fromer: often people say that TMs aren’t as necessary any more b/c of aggregators, but the areas of law may matter much more in a system where there are lots of people trying to game reputation. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:02 pm
Even injunctions against nonparties aren’t serious b/c the courts are asking only for an administrative act. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:33 am
No cuenten con medida de prisión preventiva dictada en una investigación o proceso por cualquiera de los siguientes delitos regulados en el Código Penal y leyes especiales:a) Título I, Delitos Contra la Vida, el Cuerpo y la Salud: artículos 106, 107, 108, 108-A, 108-B, 108-C, 108-D, 109, 121-B y 122-B.b) Título III, Delitos Contra la Familia: artículo 148-A.c) Título IV, Delitos Contra la Libertad:… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:34 am
In all this Merpel wonders whether the CJEU should not hire more English translators, since there is a growing number of AG Opinions that are not made available in this language] in Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (High Court of Eastern Denmark).As Katfriend Javier Ramirez explained a few months ago, this case is important because the CJEU has been asked to address issues that were left outwith earlier… [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
The conclusion that Roberts might be wobbly on the Second Amendment is perhaps a little surprising, given his votes in the leading cases in 2008 and 2010, but “we can’t count on Roberts” is at best speculative and fairly banal. [read post]
