Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 4,788
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
Often a child must be placed in the Division’s custody at birth, or other times prior to any act of abuse or neglect by a parent. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:57 am
Pennsylvania’s HB 2029 bans court references to any “foreign legal code or system” if doing so would impair constitutional rights. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:39 pm
R. 4:42-9(c). [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 2:16 pm
The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or(c)? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 10:01 am
See, e.g., R. 1:10-3; R. 4:23-1(c); R. 4:23-2. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 9:02 pm
November 21, 2011)*: The Court first concludes that Defendant’s detention was, indeed, custodial. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am
His waiver of the right to legal assistance took place without his having received advice on the point from a solicitor In advance of the trial, B’s solicitor lodged a Devolution Minute stating that B’s right to a fair trial under Article 6(3)(c) would be breached if the Crown were to lead evidence of his police interview since, it was claimed, access to a solicitor should be automatic when someone has been detained in police custody. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm
Sally Beauty Supply illustrates some basic "do's and don'ts" of holiday shopping. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
While it is indeed the case that the examination at issue of defendant’s property occurred after sentencing on another charge and followed defendant’s request for the return of such property, we conclude that the police conduct in this case did not violate defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights for a number of reasons. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
By a majority of 4-1, in principle it would not be incompatible with ECHR, art 6(1), (3)(c) for the Lord Advocate to lead and rely upon evidence of answers given during a police interview of a suspect in police custody who, before being interviewed, had been informed of his Salduz/article 6 rights to legal advice, and, without having received advice from a lawyer, had stated that he did not wish to exercise such rights. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:53 am
Because he was taken into custody, his vehicle was lawfully impounded and subjected to an inventory. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:56 am
§ 36-6-101(a)(2)(C). [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
§36-6-101(a)(2)(C) pertains to a modification of the court's prior decree pertaining to a residential parenting schedule. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
Defendant’s patdown was with reasonable suspicion. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm
Vermont & C. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
The Supreme Court observed that Domestic Relations Law 236(B)(5-a)(c) provides the formula to calculate the presumptively correct award amount, which it applied to the parties' admitted income levels. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
The Supreme Court observed that Domestic Relations Law 236(B)(5-a)(c) provides the formula to calculate the presumptively correct award amount, which it applied to the parties' admitted income levels. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:50 am
Not only did it unduly heighten the burden to modify child custody agreements–a decision since rectified in Miles v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
It’s not clear how often such reporting should occur or how detailed it must be. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:44 am
Other than number of overnights, what criteria should the family court use in deciding whether to use Schedule A or Schedule C child support guidelines? [read post]
