Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 11,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 9:36 am
In the United States neither the deceased nor their estates can sue for defamation. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:04 am
Squire Patton Boggs litigators – including lawyers who have served as US Supreme Court clerks, California’s deputy solicitor general and high-ranking federal officials – have recently notched major victories at the US Supreme Court and several US Courts of Appeals, state supreme courts and regulatory agencies. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:25 am
For instance, the state’s wage statute as well as the federal Fair Labor Standards Act both contain provisions that bar retaliation against workers who file claims under those laws. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
First, it held that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal court suits against states even in so-called federal question cases. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:35 pm
The high court has also held that the statute of limitations might time-bar some of these older cases, but only the class action litigation, not the individual claims, some of which were filed more than 15 years ago. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am
Supreme Court Has Repeatedly Affirmed The Authority of the States On This Issue For More Than 100 Years. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:51 pm
But note that none of this addresses whether another state, like Nevada, can abrogate California's immunity in its courts, just as it might abrogate any other rule of common law. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:00 am
In 2015, the state’s Supreme Court ruled such ordinances were generally unconstitutional because they were too restrictive. [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
The second interesting thing about the Endo lawsuit is that it was filed in Pennsylvania state court (where Endo has it principal place of business), and not in either California or New York state court. [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
The second interesting thing about the Endo lawsuit is that it was filed in Pennsylvania state court (where Endo has its principal place of business), and not in either California or New York state court. [read post]
11 May 2019, 8:42 am
An attorney who had litigated a civil matter for more than a year after learning of his client's death has been suspended for 30 days based on a recommendation of the California State Bar Court Hearing Department. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:38 am
Must possess a JD and be licensed in good standing by a state bar or have a limited license with expectation of receiving a JD and bar license within 6 months. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am
Misleh's actions are an apparent violation of Rule 5-200(D) of the California Bar' Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
9 May 2019, 6:20 am
Because the Ninth Circuit held that the agreement was ambiguous, the appellate court turned to California’s contra proferentem rule and held that this state law contract principle required the court to interpret the ambiguous language against the drafter—here, Lamps Plus. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:05 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: California Supreme Court Revives Libel Suit Over Warnings of Content Piracy First off today, Eriq Gardner at The Hollywood Reporter Esquire reports that the California State Supreme Court has revived a libel lawsuit filed by FilmOn saying that DoubleVerify, an organization that provides reports to advertisers about questionable sites, does not qualify for anti-SLAPP protection in this case. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:31 pm
A criminal conviction led to disbarment in California for conduct described in the report of the State Bar Court Hearing Department On March 25, 2014, respondent pled guilty to one count of violating Title 8 United States Code section 1324(a)(2)B)(iii)... [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, “in a manner that is inconsistent with this Court’s decision. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:41 am
Both the Supreme Court in the seminal Reno v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:05 am
Lawsuits were launched a year later but were rejected by the Federal Court citing a confluence of concerns involving evidence privacy and the state of Canadian copyright law. [read post]
