Search for: "California v. United States" Results 3161 - 3180 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Plaintiff, held as a federal prisoner in a state prison, was subject to a separation order from the United States Marshal's Service requiring him to be separated from three other federal inmates being held at the same facility. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:23 am
The three United States patents at issue, which cover syringes having needle shield safety devices and may be used with pre-filled pharmaceutical injection syringes, are owned by Saftey Syringes, Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
CBP [United States Customs and Border Protection] agents saw them, arrested them, seized their cameras, and deleted their pictures. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 8:26 pm
" On March 22, 2012, founding Great White member and former lead vocalist, Jack Russell filed suit against other band members and Bigg Time Entertainment, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
24 May 2017, 11:52 am by admin
Midland Funding, the giant California-based debt buyer, narrowly escaped judgment in the United States Supreme Court in May 2017, when the nation’s highest justices ruled 5-3 that they couldn’t be sued by a bankrupt debtor for filing a stale claim — i.e. a claim involving a debt where the statute of limitations had expired — in her bankruptcy case. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:09 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994). [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Interestingly, the United States appears to be attempting to restrict large-scale arbitration just at a time when other jurisdictions have begun to embrace it. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:45 am
We will be covering family-based immigration law and outlining the procedures involved in petitioning for a family member to immigrate to the United States. [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:37 pm
So if, as here, higher state courts (e.g., the California Supreme Court) have decided that the statute's constitutional, then the lower state court can't disagree. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm by Christine Swanick
  The Court, however, found that whatever anomaly might exist, it was consistent with IGRA’s history and design.[15]  IGRA was enacted, the Court noted, after the Court’s decision in California v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:51 pm by Kim Krawiec
Yesterday, as expected, the US District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of human egg donors in Kamakahi v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:29 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. [read post]