Search for: "Davis v. State"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 6,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Affirmed.Case Name: KELLY SUZANNE BRUSH, f/k/a KELLY SUZANNE DAVIS v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
Summary of Decision December 24, 2013Justice Davis delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Demers v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:47 am
Summary of Decision December 23, 2013Justice Davis delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:45 am
From the Indiana Law Blog: The ILB has obtained a copy of the filed and to-be-posted-today Court of Appeals opinion in the case of Davis v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
Their cabinet resolved to seek the Secretary of State’s approval which was forthcoming. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
Their cabinet resolved to seek the Secretary of State’s approval which was forthcoming. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
For example, in the seminal case of United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
See Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
“If the Campbells had named their son ‘R2D2,’ state authorities would have intervened,” Carlton Larson, a law professor at the University of California, Davis wrote in a 2011 study of United States baby names. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 am
Sprauve v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:56 am
Davie, supra. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:01 am
John Fund (No. 13-317), the case that may upset the Basic v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:06 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged before about United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
[Footnote: Davis ex rel. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
Affirmed.Case Name: CHRISTOPHER HARIGNORDOQUY v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
Anthony Davis, et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
My students Tess Curet, Nathan Davis, and Michael Smith worked on the brief. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
