Search for: "Dean v. Dean"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 3,697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
Supreme Court Endorses Neutrality Triangulation Approach to Constitutionality of Platform Regulation
22 Aug 2024, 7:00 am
Last month’s decision in Moody v. [read post]
Patent office and Qualcomm's litigation tactics render prof's fanboy testimony on patents unreliable
23 Jan 2019, 8:08 am
The combination of two Apple v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:30 am
Department of Justice in the Office of Tribal Justice; v Mary C. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Norton describes Rust v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
There was also a strike out application in the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Perry Homes v Cull. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
V. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
*Our penultimate session is led by Cornell Dean Stewart Schwab, Reporter for the Restatement (Third) of Employment Law. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am
And finally…II In Dutton v Bazzi [2021] FCA 1474, Rares and Rangiah JJ of the Federal Court of Australia cited Lord Kerr in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 at [43] who said: …it is wrong to engage in elaborate analysis of a tweet“. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm
Her innovative case study on the Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Gissel Packing Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 11:55 pm
In the late 1990s, the Revd Paul Williamson made several attempts to challenge the lawfulness of the ordination of women: see, for example, R (Williamson) v Dean & Chapter of St Paul’s Cathedral & Anor [1997] EWHC Admin 784. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
” In Snyder v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Tornetta v. [read post]
