Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 5,021
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2014, 5:22 am
They expect to be treated like valued members of a community, not adverse parties in a contract negotiation. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:15 am
CHEVALIER'S RATE UP, NOT DOWN.AND IF YOU LOOK AT FOOTNOTE 1 IN APPLE'S BRIEF, THIS HAS GOT TO BE A FIRST IN THE HISTORY OF DAUBERT. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:50 pm
It does say that it anticipates only a “limited” number of Connect America funded experiments, with total Connect America support of perhaps $50-100 million. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm
(emphasis added) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have a similar provision under Rule 34(b)(1)(C): (1) Contents of the Request. [read post]
Court finds much to dislike about proposed class action wage settlement; denies preliminary approval
10 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
” It also means there is no adverse party to raise to the court any defects [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 1:12 pm
Also, neither penalty under Code Section 4980H applies to any employer until at the earliest, January 1, 2015, when under the delayed effective date announced by the Obama Administration, employers with 100 or more full-time employees will become subject to Code Section 4980H. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:54 am
See also Florida Statutes, Sections 440.39 (3)(a) and 627.727(1). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Here is our listing of top developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2013 in no particular order: 1) Dust Off Those Agreements . . . [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 5:50 pm
ACA Cost-Sharing Limits Public Health Service (PHS) Act § 2707(b), as added by the ACA, requires a group health plan to ensure that any annual cost-sharing imposed under the plan does not exceed the limitations provided for under ACA §§1302(c)(1) and (c)(2). [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:21 am
File is closed and in storage w/in 100 days of injury. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am
Fair, 12 Civ. 7797 (PKC), 2012 WL 6700214, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:37 pm
Claim 1 of the ’467 patent, the only independent claim, reads, “17β-N-(2,5-bis(Trifluoromethyl))phenylcarbamoyl- 4-aza-5α-androst-1-en-3-one or a pharmaceutically acceptable solvate thereof. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
Accountability, Neutrality, and Goal Setting 1. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:26 am
1. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Even if only 1 asset-protection case in a 100 blows up on you, this is no way to run a law practice. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
” The parties’ stated the reasons they were deviating from (exceeding) the presumptively correct C.S.S.A. amount: 1. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:35 pm
Most contractors use a third party “listing service” vendor to meet this requirement, he observed, adding that most contractors will continue to do so under the new rules. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:57 am
§ 253(B) (2012). [100]. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:21 am
In addition, patent drafters are only one person or a few people, whereas competitors seeking to design around the patent may be numerous (the game show 1 vs. 100 was premised on a concept like this). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
(Simplifying: if you owe a total of $400 to various people and you only have $100, then everyone gets 1/4 of what you owe them, i.e. 25 cents on the dollar.) [read post]
