Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 10:05 pm
The Court rejected the claim that the 40% contingent fee was unreasonable. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:54 am
On December 30, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:42 am
V. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:15 pm
Counsel responded that the fees were analogous to a Supreme Court case distinguished by the Appellate Court below, Galowich v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
The case is Nichols Laboratories, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 1:42 pm
Elite Cleaning Company v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 5:58 am
In Rubenstein v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:36 pm
In Lava v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 3:24 am
TaxProf Blog op-ed: Reflections on Ridgely v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Steiner Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Employee then retained her own counsel and initiated a cross-claim against the City pursuant to General Municipal Law §50-k seeking, among other things, to recover attorneys' fees and costs she incurred in her defense in Plaintiff's action.In response City filed a motion for summary judgment dismissing Employee's cross-claim seeking fees and costs incurred in her defense of Plaintiff's action. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Employee then retained her own counsel and initiated a cross-claim against the City pursuant to General Municipal Law §50-k seeking, among other things, to recover attorneys' fees and costs she incurred in her defense in Plaintiff's action.In response City filed a motion for summary judgment dismissing Employee's cross-claim seeking fees and costs incurred in her defense of Plaintiff's action. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:08 am
See Oracle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 6:59 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
In Wallack v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:35 am
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm
For today’s Save a Legal Fee column, I cannot think of a better topic. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:11 am
The notice (i) shall be in a form approved by the board of governors; (ii) shall contain a statement of the client’s right to arbitrate; (iii) shall advise that the client has 30 days from receipt of the notice in which to elect to resolve the dispute under this Part; (iv) shall be accompanied by the written instructions and procedures for the arbitral body having jurisdiction over the fee dispute, which explain how to commence a fee arbitration proceeding; and (v)… [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:10 pm
AstraZeneca v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 5:49 am
Comcast requested attorney's fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
