Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 6,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 11:18 am
So the plaintiff sued the innovator instead, asserting blithely that “‘[e]ven if [the defendants are] correct that plaintiff ingested a generic, that does not and should not relieve [them] of liability’ as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:48 am
Compensation for a matter such as this can range from help with medical costs and injuries (both physical and emotional) to help with payment of funeral costs for those whose side effects proved to be fatal. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:24 am
July 15, 2015 - 11 AM: In re Johnson & Johnson, Serial No.77684321 [Refusal to register the mark BEST FOR BABY for "Toiletries, namely, baby bath skin cleansers and washes, and baby lotion," on the ground that applicant's specimens do not establish trademark use.]July 21, 2015 - 2 PM: In re Epiq Systems, Inc., Serial Nos. 85979129 and 85978692 [Refusal to register the marks DMX MOBILE and DOCUMATRIX MOBILE for "Consulting in the field of technical support… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
So even if Texas were required to permit racial slurs on specialty plates (a matter about which I’m not sure – perhaps Texas, because of its history concerning race, has a strong interest in separating itself from any racist message that, if attributed to the state, might raise equal protection problems), the present case is different: the Confederate battle flag is worse in this regard than a racial slur; it is akin to a racial slur that was adopted and previously used as a… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 5:08 am
No matter what they think of such language in Nebraska. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
I regularly visited the older lawyers and asked advice on matters. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:54 pm
No matter if you are a Conservative or a Liberal. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:54 pm
No matter if you are a Conservative or a Liberal. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
By the time the majority opinion was filed last Friday in Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Additionally, there is the matter of timing. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Additionally, there is the matter of timing. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
As Judge Cheryl Johnson pointed out in her concurrence in Robbins II, as a practical matter judges don't evaluate science but evidence, and in the case of forensics in particular, testimony. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
It asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:22 am
Rafel, LLC to discuss your disability matter and how we can help! [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:22 am
Rafel, LLC to discuss your disability matter and how we can help! [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
This, of course, raises the question of who should decide this matter: the states or the nation’s highest court? [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:19 am
The husband argued that the emancipation of the child was simply a convenient ending point for terminating alimony, but his argument did not matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:34 am
(This Kat would like to apologise if his question, which supposed that the cap applied to the total recoverable costs, caused confusion; however it appears that many present shared his misunderstanding, so it is perhaps as well that the matter was aired).There are issues if there are multiple defendants - if they win do they all get their costs? [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:06 pm
No matter how it rules, the Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:56 pm
What that really asks the witness to do is to make the judge’s decision for the judge, and that is answer questions that involve matters of law, that is whether the activities or actions of the defendant were reasonable. [read post]
