Search for: "In Re Hollywood" Results 3161 - 3180 of 3,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2023, 4:02 am by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
Without further ado, we give you our verdict on Hollywood’s best pictures about lawyers. 10. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
No Re-Verifying Current Employees  Refrain from re-verifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by the employment eligibility verification provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 USC § 1324a(b), or would violate any E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding the employer has entered into with the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Jeff Gamso
“And we’re pretty sure your mother framed him. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:39 am by royblack
” The book provides excellent examples of “Commander’s Intent” used by the military to simplify operational instructions for battlefield units confronted with the fact that “No plan survives contact with the enemy;” paring down the ’92 Clinton campaign message to “It’s the economy stupid;” following the generally applicable rule in journalism of not “burying the lead”; the “a bird in the hand” metaphor and its… [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 9:08 am by Editor Charlie
They’ve now expanded this to all sorts of different content owners, whether it be Hollywood studios, music labels, the White House, Downing Street, whatever. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 7:21 pm by Bill Marler
  Technologically speaking, cell phones were a thing of Hollywood 30 years ago, computers were somewhat rare, and handheld devices were on Star Trek, not found in the real world. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:35 pm by Lara
Ben asked people what they think of SOPA/PIPA and Y Combinator’s call for Kill Hollywood. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
I suppose another one of my bugbears is this – I think defamation law in Australia has moved away from being a tort that is about damage to reputation and has been re-defined fairly substantially as a tort for compensation for hurt feelings because something has been said that has the potential to cause damage to reputation. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:25 pm by StephanieWestAllen
Maybe since i have a national presence I can ask a newspaper if they're interested in one of my travel stories. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
The Commission even conceded that a re-broadcast of precisely the same offending clips from the two Billboard Music Award programs for the purpose of providing background information on this case would not result in any action by the FCC, even though in those circumstances viewers would be subjected to the same "first blow" that resulted from the original airing of this material. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:04 am by Editors
Does the texting generation need the ruler? [read post]