Search for: "JONES v. STATE."
Results 3161 - 3180
of 6,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
This also means that for these tenancies cases such as Church Commissioners v Meya, Macdonald v Fernandez, and Lower St Properties v Jones are also all irrelevant as they all deal with aspects of s21(4)(a) notices. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
See Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm
Gillette has since been cited (for instance, by Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
An uncharacteristically amenable Court heard argument on Tuesday in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
The Court has held that there’s a compelling government interest in banning race discrimination in government-supported education (Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:08 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:26 pm
Jones: Is the DC Circuit’s mosaic analysis in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:37 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
In a New Jersey case, a very different result -- the state supreme court held that the state’s constitution requires a warrant. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:14 am
The Case of Our Savior Lutheran Church v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:43 am
Jones, J.S.C. in the matter of A.W. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
Jones v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:00 pm
The Supreme Court had the opportunity to reign in the scope of police surveillance in Jones v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:05 am
” After only 2.5 hours deliberating, the jury reached a verdict in John Ray III v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:58 am
Consequently, the court did not need to resolve whether the technicians fell within the outside sales exemption, or whether the company owner was individually liable as a statutory employer, before finding the company was exempt from the statute’s overtime provisions and granting summary judgment in its favor on the technicians’ class action wage claims (Jones v Tucker Communications, Inc, November 18, 2013, Treadwell, M). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
The Court, relying on Mescalero Apache Tribe v. [read post]
