Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2009, 2:40 am
Stokes, Taking Back the Fifth: Why Kansas' Approach to Inverse Condemnation Violates the United States Constitution and Leads to Unnecessary Confusion [Estate of Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:01 am
For good measure, United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:38 am
Holly Rudolph provided a well-prepared, concise overview of state recreational land use statutes and the exceptions to the Equine Activity Liability Acts in various states. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am
United States, a case about whether property owners are entitled to a jury when the federal government takes their land,” arguing that “[a] jury is key when it comes to compensation questions because the government has an obvious conflict of interest in appraising ‘fair’ market value. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:51 am
In Mensh v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
KEITHINKING: So much for my theory that maybe the 9th Circuit's decision in The Lands Council v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:04 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm
The United States Constitution, Article 5 states, “No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:47 pm
Khan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm
Because getting shot by the cops — whether by tasers or guns — is just something I’ve come to expect in the United States of Amerika. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:53 pm
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am
That 1872 ruling, in the case of United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Second, Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Second, Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Second, Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
