Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 3161 - 3180 of 3,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
(Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Katrina Dewey, CEO & Publisher, Lawdragon, Inc.) [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:23 am
  In addition to relying on a pollution exclusion argument, insurers seem intent on showing that each installation of drywall constitutes a separate “occurrence” under the policy, and as such, a separate deductible would apply to each. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:33 am
  The first is that directors ought to be able to defend themselves, and so there should be no prohibition for the insurance providing defense expense protection. [read post]
EBROM A defendant in a health care liability claim may appeal from the interlocutory order denying its objection to t [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 8:38 am
Thanks to a very effective and coordinated campaign by the medical liability insurance industry, a lot of people think that true cases of medical negligence, or medical malpractice, are rare. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 10:32 am
On or about June 19, 2007, Plaintiff Anna A. and Defendant XYZ entered into a written contract of motor vehicle bodily liability insurance which included provisions for bodily injury damages incurred by uninsured motorists. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
As an experienced injury lawyer who has litigated similar accidents, I feel it is important to note that a full investigation of the facts of this case should be conducted in order to determine liability and all potential defendants. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
In Flexsys America LP v XL Insurance Co Ltd [2009] EWHC 1115 (Comm) the Claimant, Flexsys America LP (Flexsys) sought to recover the balance of its legal costs from the defendant XL Insurance Company (XL) under a Master Policy when its Local Policy (which covered Flexsys), taken out with XL Select, was exhausted. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 pm
One-way cost shifting means that when the defendant loses, he pays the claimant's costs; when the claimant loses, each side bears its own costs. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 8:46 am
And, claims defended by the seller’s own carrier will invariably result in higher premiums. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:47 am by bhamdefenseatty
 It further found that Central Mutual had provided a defense to Trinity, that the additional $754,530 paid by the co-defendant’s insurer was a “voluntary payment” to which Central Mutual had not consented, and that the policy’s language did not subject the insurer to liability for such payments. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:47 am by bhamdefenseatty
 It further found that Central Mutual had provided a defense to Trinity, that the additional $754,530 paid by the co-defendant’s insurer was a “voluntary payment” to which Central Mutual had not consented, and that the policy’s language did not subject the insurer to liability for such payments. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
The jury may render a "defense verdict," meaning that it finds no liability on the party of the defendant. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:27 am
An insurer was recently granted summary judgment against its insured based on a commercial general liability insurance policy’s total liquor liability exclusion (“TLLE”). [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:47 am
Wyeth, a pharmaceutical and health care product manufacturer, purchased 20% of its excess product liability insurance from one insurer in the 1980s. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am by Charon QC
They will run backwards and they will taunt each other. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Each different relationship draws out of us someone slightly different. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:07 am
  In addition to the common element of bankruptcy, and the fact that as a result of the bankruptcy in each of the cases the company was not names as a defendant in the lawsuits, the recent actions against Charter, Nortel and Idearc also share something else in common, which is that each of these companies is outside the financial sector. [read post]
30 May 2009, 6:45 am by Jim Jenkins
This particular defendant, Inciarrano, went into someone's business and shot and killed them and the entire event was being recorded by the victim without the defendant’s knowledge. [read post]