Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 20,231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:55 am
Our office drafted an extensive brief which explained the nature of our client’s long trip abroad and argued that he is otherwise eligible for naturalization despite his long trip outside United States. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:49 am
United States] and Printz [v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:48 am
United States provided a break from two notions that the government has long taken for granted. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
The term “state,” as used in the ACA, has a broad meaning that encompasses “state” in the scholarly sense of a nation-state and the customized meaning of “state” as a sub-national unit of government. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Ask Huey Long. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:58 pm
(Eugene Volokh) No, says the district court in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:08 pm
The CAAF recently decided United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
Williams v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 7:36 pm
Procedural HistoryHemphill first filed suit against Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 1999, alleging that J&J’s Stayfree, Carefree, and Serenity sanitary napkins and adult incontinence products infringed claim 2 of United States Patent No. 4,557,720 (“the ’720 patent”). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
But most recently, the Supreme Court of the United States has halted the massive job discrimination lawsuit against mega-retailer Wal-Mart Stores Inc., stating that the Plaintiffs had not shown justification for the sweeping class-action status. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:23 am
United States Department of Defense, 836 F.3d 57 (D.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm
In his opinion for the majority in Jones v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 2:05 am
White v. [read post]
