Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 5:01 am
Moreover, the Supreme Court in the case of De Rossa v Independent Newspapers endorsed the view that juries should not be given guidelines on damages by judges. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Lord Hope’s Decision in Powell I don’t intend here to go through the facts of Powell but rather to outline the stages of the review required that Lord Hope lays out in the judgment: 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The House of Lords held that the words were not capable of referring to him. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:22 am
This is the lesson of reading together the judgments of the Paris Court of appeal and of the UK Supreme Court in Dallah v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:41 am
The Albufeira Judicial Court had refused to allow the applicant to call alibi witnesses: it was stated that the applicant had had enough witnesses and there was no time to call more witnesses. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
Not all speech is protected by freedom of expression rights, and not all protest is legitimate in the eyes of the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Although the analysis focuses on the history of patent law in the United States, it develops themes that illuminate the evolution of patent regimes in Europe [In this regard, the US is the sun to Europe's moon. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In England, discussion has been dominated by the House of Commons report [1] and Lord Lester’s law reform bill [2]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
The English Court encountered this situation recently in R v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Gambia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 121 (17 February 2011) Test Claimants In the Thin Cap Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 127 (18 February 2011) Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 133 (18 February 2011) Welford v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 129 (18 February 2011) Bayat Telephone… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Not all speech is protected by freedom of expression rights, and not all protest is legitimate in the eyes of the state. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
In proceedings by prisoners subsequently heard in Scotland (Smith v Scott [2007] SC 345), Northern Ireland (R v Secretary of State ex parte Toner and Walsh [1997] NIQB 18) and in England and Wales (Chester v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 1439) the relevant Secretary of State has expressly accepted that the ban on prisoner voting is incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:24 am
I don't remember Grutter v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Germany (Case C? [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
