Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 3161 - 3180 of 42,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2023, 3:48 pm by Patricia Salkin
 The court additionally observed that “the evidence submitted by the Village in support of the motion either was not documentary evidence…, did not resolve all factual issues as a matter of law, or did not conclusively establish that a material fact as claimed by the petitioners was not a fact at all and that no significant dispute exists regarding it. [read post]
1 May 2023, 11:24 am by Bonnie Lawston
Dying intestate (dying without a will) or with a will the court rules invalid. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:42 am by cordiscosaistg
Average Workers Compensation Head Injury Settlement The average workers’ compensation settlement for traumatic brain injuries was approximately $136,000 from 2013 to 2018, according to the National Council on Compensation Insurance. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
Most importantly, in terms of the two-tiered approach to remedial measures and sanctions under Rule 37, the court found that the most serious sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2) would be warranted in this case as, on balance, the evidence establishes that Google acted with intent to deprive the plaintiffs of relevant evidence in allowing the “no history” chat discussions about the case to continue unabated. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
Most importantly, in terms of the two-tiered approach to remedial measures and sanctions under Rule 37, the court found that the most serious sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2) would be warranted in this case as, on balance, the evidence establishes that Google acted with intent to deprive the plaintiffs of relevant evidence in allowing the “no history” chat discussions about the case to continue unabated. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
Most importantly, in terms of the two-tiered approach to remedial measures and sanctions under Rule 37, the court found that the most serious sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2) would be warranted in this case as, on balance, the evidence establishes that Google acted with intent to deprive the plaintiffs of relevant evidence in allowing the “no history” chat discussions about the case to continue unabated. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
But it provides yet more evidence that 512(f) doesn’t help victims of bogus takedown notices. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 11:49 am by Hanlon Law, PA
Crimes Requiring Sex Offender Registration On appeal, the court affirmed the trial court ruling. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Lawless resigned as Bar Counsel, her deputy refused to challenge the findings below and cited "significant mitigation" to request that the Supreme Court "exercise its discretion and dismiss this matter. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:37 am by Emma Kent
Practice Direction 12J of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 contains guidance on determining whether such a hearing is necessary. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 3:02 am by Seán Binder
 While the report acknowledged that it is “entirely appropriate” for a rights organization to criticize violations by a victim of aggression, “provided that there is sufficient evidence of such violations,” it concluded Amnesty’s accusation was “not sufficiently substantiated” by the available evidence. [read post]
  Bear in mind that it may also become necessary to evidence such consideration. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 2:16 pm by Broussard, David & Moroux
But not matter the type of case, all claims have one thing in common: a time limit for how long you can bring your case to court. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 10:09 am by Bryan West
Favourable evidence reviewed by the court may prove persuasive even if it’s not formally found to be necessary to resolve the matter – or even ruled admissible. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The 17th Amendment did, to be sure, place the power of selection of senators in the hands of state electorates instead of state legislatures, but, to put it mildly, that did nothing to eliminate the extent to which the Senate is both theoretically illegitimate and, as a practical matter, often egregious hostile to achieving progressive legislation. [read post]