Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 19,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:21 pm
Related Cases: Shubert v ObamaJewel v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:52 am
Crane, Cato Regulation magazine] “Solicitor General Inveighs Against Antitrust-Law Revolution in SCOTUS ‘Apple v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
No. 3122052) filed on February 24, 2005 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and stated to have been first used in commerce at least as early as February 4, 2004 (the "FACEBOOK Marks"), and a European Community Trademark for FACEBOOK (Reg. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
Ed. 2d 497 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:58 am
State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:23 am
In The Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:23 am
In The Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
Dfinity Found. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:03 pm
See Mason v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
This contract stated that the bag business sold by Baquet included the Benelux word mark NATHAN, which he had had registered in 1991 for leather items, clothing and shoes in Classes 18 and 25. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:14 am
State-based registrations offer some of the protections of federal registration, and are a useful tool to stake one’s claim in a trademark within the states that the mark is used, and provide notice to competitors of that claim. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Kubiak v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:28 am
Consistent with the Second, Sixth, and Eighth circuit courts’ holdings, the 7th Circuit held in Richardson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
From there, we turned to the rise of the right of publicity in the United States, A Right is Born: Celebrity, Property and Postmodern Lawmaking, by Mark Bartholomew, who explored a fascinating tension regarding the growth of the right of publicity both before and after the 1980s. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
Apple damages lawsuit in a couple of years, but in order for that to happen, Epic firstly needs to convince the judges that Apple has violated the antitrust laws.Apple will be represented at the hearing by Mark Perry, who already sported a ponytail at some of the Epic v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:54 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
However, the recent Enfish v. [read post]
