Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
C. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
*The Appellate Division said that Supreme Court erred when it concluded that Mathis was no longer a probationary employee on the date he was terminated because Supreme Court calculated the extension required by 4 NYCRR 4.5(g) using calendar days rather than workdays.In the words of the Appellate Division, “Where, as here, a probationary term is extended pursuant to 4 NYCRR 4.5 (g), the extension is "one workday for every workday" the employee has missed. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” (c) The Australian Press Council’s 2007 submission to the Minister for Telecommunication 23 April 2007 The APC suggested, albeit in two paragraphs, that a voluntary code of conduct for bloggers could be considered[8]. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
But as Justice Sotomayor points out in her well-written dissent, there also is a savings clause: Section 22(a) expressly provides that the "[g]eneral rule" is that "State law shall apply to a civil action brought for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
The finding must be elevated above the “probable” level set out in s 140(1) of the Evidence Act 1995 to consider the matters contemplated in s 140(2) of that Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:14 am
.-(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act,-(a) any text, rule or interpretation of Hindu law or any custom or usage as part of that law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to have effect with respect to any matter for which provision is made in this Act;(b) any other law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to apply to Hindus in so far as it is inconsistent with any of the provisions contained in this Act.2. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 5:21 am
But let me also note that given the broad scope of the next two provisions, I'm not sure it matters much how the non-discrimination provision is interpreted. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
This submission was based on sub-paragraph VI.E.7.3.3.c) of the 6th edition of the “Case Law” book as far as it is identical to the 5th edition (see sub-paragraph VI.E.6.2.2.c)). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:37 am
Lionheat Publ’g, FA 1069901 (Nat. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:49 am
Magistrate Judge James C. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
T 258/03 [headnote 1] and G 3/08 [10.7]).[5.1] This dispels the only objection that has been directly raised against the original method claims. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:11 pm
The Ministry has carefully re-examined the matter in the context of the emerging trends in the economy and regulatory and accounting practices and has decided that the permission may be granted on a general basis wherever the Board of Directors of the holding company gives its consent and the conditions prescribed are complied with. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
& C.4th 362 (C.P. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
It does not matter in what form the subject of the appeal is identified, as long as it is clear. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
C. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:14 pm
G. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Article 10 was central to the Court’s reasoning in the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union case (Társaság a Szabadságjogokért v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
The Los Angeles Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, concluding that the drivers were properly classified as a matter of law and not entitled to trial on their claims. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
There are also some very interesting statements on a possible case of partiality of an OD member and on how ODs should (or should not) be composed.[2] The contested patent has been revoked for containing subject-matter that extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed (A 100(c)). [read post]
